CVE-2026-82465
When an IdP sends no SessionIndex, a session can be destroyed based solely on the NameID, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to submit an unsigned LogoutRequest with a guessed identifier (e.g., an email address used as NameID) to terminate a victim's…
Does this matter?
Lower severity and a low EPSS score (0.18%). Track it; it rarely justifies an emergency change on its own.
Description
pac4j-saml before 6.5.6 does not require signature validation of SAML LogoutRequest messages in SAML2LogoutValidator.validateLogoutRequest(). When an IdP sends no SessionIndex, a session can be destroyed based solely on the NameID, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to submit an unsigned LogoutRequest with a guessed identifier (e.g., an email address used as NameID) to terminate a victim's SAML session.
- CVSS 4.0
- 6.9 MEDIUMCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/M
- EPSS
- 0.18% probability · 8th percentile
- CISA KEV
- Not listed
- Weakness
- CWE-345
- Source
- disclosure@vulncheck.com
References
- https://github.com/pac4j/pac4j
- https://github.com/pac4j/pac4j/blob/pac4j-parent-6.5.5/pac4j-saml/src/main/java/org/pac4j/saml/logout/impl/SAML2LogoutValidator.java
- https://github.com/pac4j/pac4j/commit/2270c3ff70e93cc43831e75702acd5135531237e
- https://www.pac4j.org/blog/security-advisory-pac4j-core-oidc-saml.html
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/pac4j-saml-before-6.5.6-session-destruction-via-unsigned-logoutrequest
Source: NVD record, EPSS from FIRST.org, KEV from CISA. Refreshed daily.