CVE-2026-66373
Redis before 8.8.0, in the unusual case where an authenticated attacker can execute RESTORE, allows remote code execution via a RESTORE payload where the same NACK (pending entry) is referenced by more than one consumer, because deleting both consumers…
Does this matter?
High impact if exploited, but EPSS currently rates exploitation as unlikely (0.56%). Schedule it in the normal patch cycle and watch for a rise in EPSS or a public exploit.
Description
Redis before 8.8.0, in the unusual case where an authenticated attacker can execute RESTORE, allows remote code execution via a RESTORE payload where the same NACK (pending entry) is referenced by more than one consumer, because deleting both consumers via XGROUP DELCONSUMER leads to a double free. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2026-25243.
- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 HIGHCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- EPSS
- 0.56% probability · 45th percentile
- CISA KEV
- Not listed
- Weakness
- CWE-415
- Source
- cve@mitre.org
References
- https://github.com/berabuddies/redis-poc
- https://github.com/redis/redis/compare/8.6.4...8.8.0
- https://github.com/redis/redis/pull/15081
- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49024938
- https://x.com/Fried_rice/status/2080059356322918777
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2026/08/msg00012.html
- https://github.com/berabuddies/redis-poc
Source: NVD record, EPSS from FIRST.org, KEV from CISA. Refreshed daily.