CVE-2026-59888
From 2.15.0 until 2.18.8, 2.21.4, and 3.1.4, Java Records using a PropertyNamingStrategy can bypass @JsonIgnore because POJOPropertiesCollector._removeUnwantedIgnorals() records an ignored component under its original implicit name before _renameUsing()…
Does this matter?
Lower severity and a low EPSS score (0.31%). Track it; it rarely justifies an emergency change on its own.
Description
jackson-databind contains the general-purpose data-binding functionality and tree-model for Jackson Data Processor. From 2.15.0 until 2.18.8, 2.21.4, and 3.1.4, Java Records using a PropertyNamingStrategy can bypass @JsonIgnore because POJOPropertiesCollector._removeUnwantedIgnorals() records an ignored component under its original implicit name before _renameUsing() applies the naming strategy, allowing the renamed JSON key to be assigned to the Record constructor parameter. This issue is fixed in versions 2.18.8, 2.21.4, and 3.1.4.
- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 MEDIUMCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
- EPSS
- 0.31% probability · 24th percentile
- CISA KEV
- Not listed
- Weakness
- CWE-915
- Source
- security-advisories@github.com
References
- https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/commit/baa2cdf5ca2b2717fbb88d91955d69d8651df3e4
- https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/commit/c7c678360624da5bc7eed2152789fa522880db9d
- https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/pull/5974
- https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/security/advisories/GHSA-3pjw-73gf-8qr5
Source: NVD record, EPSS from FIRST.org, KEV from CISA. Refreshed daily.