CVE-2026-33184
With limit = 0, that wraps to usize::MAX and then in rand 0.9.2, choose_multiple() immediately attempts Vec::with_capacity(amount), which deterministically panics with capacity overflow.
Does this matter?
High impact if exploited, but EPSS currently rates exploitation as unlikely (0.46%). Schedule it in the normal patch cycle and watch for a rise in EPSS or a public exploit.
Description
nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, the discovery handler accepts a peer-controlled limit during handshake and stores it unchanged. The immediate HandshakeAck path then honors limit = 0 and returns zero contacts, which makes the session look benign. Later, after the same session reaches Established, the periodic update path computes self.peer_list_limit.unwrap() as usize - 1. With limit = 0, that wraps to usize::MAX and then in rand 0.9.2, choose_multiple() immediately attempts Vec::with_capacity(amount), which deterministically panics with capacity overflow. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.
- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 HIGHCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
- EPSS
- 0.46% probability · 39th percentile
- CISA KEV
- Not listed
- Weakness
- CWE-191
- Affected
- nimiq/nimiq proof-of-stake
- Source
- security-advisories@github.com
References
- https://github.com/nimiq/core-rs-albatross/commit/8f60a2d75b74b55764ecf34bd4435f4961630595Patch
- https://github.com/nimiq/core-rs-albatross/pull/3664Patch
- https://github.com/nimiq/core-rs-albatross/releases/tag/v1.3.0Release Notes
- https://github.com/nimiq/core-rs-albatross/security/advisories/GHSA-5rm9-893q-vmhmVendor Advisory
Source: NVD record, EPSS from FIRST.org, KEV from CISA. Refreshed daily.