CVE-2026-14890
SGLang uses an expert-parallel backup subsystem that exposes a ZeroMQ PULL socket on a routable network interface that does not contain authentication or deserialization safeguards, allowing an attacker to provide a malicious pickle file that results in…
Does this matter?
High impact if exploited, but EPSS currently rates exploitation as unlikely (1.00%). Schedule it in the normal patch cycle and watch for a rise in EPSS or a public exploit.
Description
SGLang uses an expert-parallel backup subsystem that exposes a ZeroMQ PULL socket on a routable network interface that does not contain authentication or deserialization safeguards, allowing an attacker to provide a malicious pickle file that results in unauthenticated remote code execution when the feature is enabled and the service is reachable over the network.
- CVSS 3.1
- 9.1 CRITICALCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
- EPSS
- 1.00% probability · 61th percentile
- CISA KEV
- Not listed
- Weakness
- CWE-502
- Affected
- lmsys/sglang
- Source
- cret@cert.org
References
- http://vince.cert.org/vuls/id/326070Permissions Required
- https://github.com/sgl-project/sglang/blob/main/python/sglang/srt/elastic_ep/expert_backup_manager.pyProduct
- https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/326070Mitigation, Third Party Advisory
Source: NVD record, EPSS from FIRST.org, KEV from CISA. Refreshed daily.