CVE-2026-119050
Agno through 3.1.11 contains an unsafe reflection vulnerability in PandasTools that allows attackers to invoke arbitrary pandas functions by supplying model-controlled function names to getattr().
Does this matter?
High impact if exploited, but EPSS currently rates exploitation as unlikely (0.43%). Schedule it in the normal patch cycle and watch for a rise in EPSS or a public exploit.
Description
Agno through 3.1.11 contains an unsafe reflection vulnerability in PandasTools that allows attackers to invoke arbitrary pandas functions by supplying model-controlled function names to getattr(). Attackers can use prompt injection to make the agent call pandas.read_pickle on attacker-controlled paths for code execution, or call other readers to read local files.
- CVSS 4.0
- 9.2 CRITICALCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/M
- EPSS
- 0.43% probability · 37th percentile
- Public exploits
- None in Exploit-DB
- CISA KEV
- Not listed
- Weakness
- CWE-470
- Source
- disclosure@vulncheck.com
EPSS moved from 0.4% on 30 October 2026 to 0.4% on 3 November 2026.
References
- https://github.com/agno-agi/agno
- https://github.com/agno-agi/agno/blob/d9ab0a758286142e7d998ef313ee7504d7fd9453/libs/agno/agno/tools/pandas.py#L54
- https://github.com/agno-agi/agno/blob/d9ab0a758286142e7d998ef313ee7504d7fd9453/libs/agno/agno/tools/pandas.py#L90
- https://github.com/agno-agi/agno/issues/8699
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/agno-through-3.1.11-code-execution-via-pandastools-unsafe-reflection
- https://github.com/agno-agi/agno/issues/8699
Source: NVD record, EPSS from FIRST.org, KEV from CISA, exploits from Exploit-DB. Refreshed daily. Download this record as JSON.