CVE-2026-108376
A crafted record name can become an arbitrary Python expression that executes when an instance of the generated model consumes the field default.
Does this matter?
High impact if exploited, but EPSS currently rates exploitation as unlikely (0.48%). Schedule it in the normal patch cycle and watch for a rise in EPSS or a public exploit.
Description
dataclasses-avroschema generates Avro schemas from Python dataclasses, Pydantic models, and Faust Records and generates Python code from Avro schemas. From version 0.47.3 through 0.70.5, FieldRepresentation.get_field_default inserts a schema-controlled referenced record name into the callable position of a generated default_factory lambda without validating it as an Avro name. A crafted record name can become an arbitrary Python expression that executes when an instance of the generated model consumes the field default. Version 0.70.6 fixes the vulnerability by rejecting record names that do not match the Avro name grammar.
- CVSS 3.1
- 8.8 HIGHCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- EPSS
- 0.48% probability · 41th percentile
- Public exploits
- None in Exploit-DB
- CISA KEV
- Not listed
- Weakness
- CWE-94
- Source
- security-advisories@github.com
EPSS moved from 0.4% on 14 October 2026 to 0.5% on 26 October 2026.
References
- https://github.com/marcosschroh/dataclasses-avroschema/commit/429f3d705d2d04c0c65e2ef832daed5ff91318fc
- https://github.com/marcosschroh/dataclasses-avroschema/releases/tag/0.70.6
- https://github.com/marcosschroh/dataclasses-avroschema/security/advisories/GHSA-jcjg-gjg5-xp7v
- https://hackmd.io/@1ExmmukzRMWN7B4gQ4W-4Q/cve-2026-110113-publiccms-trade-address-save-cross-user-overwrite
Source: NVD record, EPSS from FIRST.org, KEV from CISA, exploits from Exploit-DB. Refreshed daily. Download this record as JSON.