CVE-2026-101049
Remote unauthenticated attackers can send forged Slack events to known webhook URLs to trigger workflows with the owner's credentials.
Does this matter?
High impact if exploited, but EPSS currently rates exploitation as unlikely (0.38%). Schedule it in the normal patch cycle and watch for a rise in EPSS or a public exploit.
Description
Heym before 0.0.53 fails to verify Slack request signatures when trigger nodes lack credential IDs or have empty signing secrets. Remote unauthenticated attackers can send forged Slack events to known webhook URLs to trigger workflows with the owner's credentials.
- CVSS 4.0
- 8.3 HIGHCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/M
- EPSS
- 0.38% probability · 32th percentile
- Public exploits
- None in Exploit-DB
- CISA KEV
- Not listed
- Weakness
- CWE-287
- Source
- disclosure@vulncheck.com
EPSS moved from 0.3% on 28 September 2026 to 0.4% on 26 October 2026.
References
- https://github.com/heymrun/heym/commit/341d1012367cd74f85c617e1c98dd49e3fcb5e83
- https://github.com/heymrun/heym/security/advisories/GHSA-pm6h-x3h5-j38h
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/heym-before-0.0.53-slack-webhook-signature-verification-bypass
- https://github.com/heymrun/heym/security/advisories/GHSA-pm6h-x3h5-j38h
Source: NVD record, EPSS from FIRST.org, KEV from CISA, exploits from Exploit-DB. Refreshed daily. Download this record as JSON.