CVE-2024-37150
All users relying on .npmrc are potentially affected by this vulnerability if their private registry references tarball URLs at a different domain.
Does this matter?
Lower severity and a low EPSS score (0.42%). Track it; it rarely justifies an emergency change on its own.
Description
An issue in `.npmrc` support in Deno 1.44.0 was discovered where Deno would send `.npmrc` credentials for the scope to the tarball URL when the registry provided URLs for a tarball on a different domain. All users relying on .npmrc are potentially affected by this vulnerability if their private registry references tarball URLs at a different domain. This includes usage of deno install subcommand, auto-install for npm: specifiers and LSP usage. It is recommended to upgrade to Deno 1.44.1 and if your private registry ever serves tarballs at a different domain to rotate your registry credentials.
- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 MEDIUMCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
- EPSS
- 0.42% probability · 35th percentile
- CISA KEV
- Not listed
- Weakness
- CWE-200, CWE-706
- Affected
- deno/deno
- Source
- security-advisories@github.com
References
- https://github.com/denoland/deno/commit/566adb7c0a0c0845e90a6e867a2c0ef5d2ada575Patch
- https://github.com/denoland/deno/security/advisories/GHSA-rfc6-h225-3vxvVendor Advisory
- https://github.com/npm/cli/wiki/%22No-auth-for-URI,-but-auth-present-for-scoped-registry%22Not Applicable
- https://github.com/denoland/deno/commit/566adb7c0a0c0845e90a6e867a2c0ef5d2ada575Patch
- https://github.com/denoland/deno/security/advisories/GHSA-rfc6-h225-3vxvVendor Advisory
- https://github.com/npm/cli/wiki/%22No-auth-for-URI,-but-auth-present-for-scoped-registry%22Not Applicable
Source: NVD record, EPSS from FIRST.org, KEV from CISA. Refreshed daily.