CVE-2024-10306
A vulnerability was found in mod_proxy_cluster.
Does this matter?
Lower severity and a low EPSS score (0.31%). Track it; it rarely justifies an emergency change on its own.
Description
A vulnerability was found in mod_proxy_cluster. The issue is that the <Directory> directive should be replaced by the <Location> directive as the former does not restrict IP/host access as `Require ip IP_ADDRESS` would suggest. This means that anyone with access to the host might send MCMP requests that may result in adding/removing/updating nodes for the balancing. However, this host should not be accessible to the public network as it does not serve the general traffic.
- CVSS 3.1
- 5.4 MEDIUMCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
- EPSS
- 0.31% probability · 24th percentile
- CISA KEV
- Not listed
- Weakness
- CWE-863
- Source
- secalert@redhat.com
References
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2025:2973
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2025:5309
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9434
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9466
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9997
- https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-10306
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2321302
- https://github.com/modcluster/mod_proxy_cluster/pull/309
Source: NVD record, EPSS from FIRST.org, KEV from CISA. Refreshed daily.