CVE-2024-0759
This would require the attacker also be able to guess these internal IPs as `/*` ranging is not possible, but could be brute forced.
Does this matter?
High impact if exploited, but EPSS currently rates exploitation as unlikely (0.97%). Schedule it in the normal patch cycle and watch for a rise in EPSS or a public exploit.
Description
Should an instance of AnythingLLM be hosted on an internal network and the attacked be explicitly granted a permission level of manager or admin, they could link-scrape internally resolving IPs of other services that are on the same network as AnythingLLM. This would require the attacker also be able to guess these internal IPs as `/*` ranging is not possible, but could be brute forced. There is a duty of care that other services on the same network would not be fully open and accessible via a simple CuRL with zero authentication as it is not possible to set headers or access via the link collector.
- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 HIGHCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
- EPSS
- 0.97% probability · 60th percentile
- CISA KEV
- Not listed
- Weakness
- CWE-918
- Affected
- mintplexlabs/anythingllm
- Source
- security@huntr.dev
References
- https://github.com/mintplex-labs/anything-llm/commit/0db6c3b2aa1787a7054ffdaba975474f122c20ebPatch
- https://huntr.com/bounties/9a978edd-ac94-41fc-8e3e-c35441bdd12bExploit
- https://github.com/mintplex-labs/anything-llm/commit/0db6c3b2aa1787a7054ffdaba975474f122c20ebPatch
- https://huntr.com/bounties/9a978edd-ac94-41fc-8e3e-c35441bdd12bExploit
Source: NVD record, EPSS from FIRST.org, KEV from CISA. Refreshed daily.