VulnerabilityModified
CVE-2023-46052
NOTE: this is disputed because there is no expectation that test.c code should be executed with an attacker-controlled configuration file.
HIGH 7.1EPSS 0.36%
Does this matter?
High impact if exploited, but EPSS currently rates exploitation as unlikely (0.36%). Schedule it in the normal patch cycle and watch for a rise in EPSS or a public exploit.
Description
Sane 1.2.1 heap bounds overwrite in init_options() from backend/test.c via a long init_mode string in a configuration file. NOTE: this is disputed because there is no expectation that test.c code should be executed with an attacker-controlled configuration file.
- CVSS 3.1
- 7.1 HIGHCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
- EPSS
- 0.36% probability · 30th percentile
- CISA KEV
- Not listed
- Affected
- sane-project/sane backends
- Source
- cve@mitre.org
References
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2024/Jan/69Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
- https://gitlab.com/sane-project/backends/-/issues/709Exploit, Issue Tracking
- http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/176823/sane-1.2.1-Buffer-Overflow.html
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2024/Jan/69Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
- https://gitlab.com/sane-project/backends/-/issues/709Exploit, Issue Tracking
Source: NVD record, EPSS from FIRST.org, KEV from CISA. Refreshed daily.