SOC status:Duty analyst on shift

UK Cyber Defence
VulnerabilityModified

CVE-2022-34265

The Trunc() and Extract() database functions are subject to SQL injection if untrusted data is used as a kind/lookup_name value.

CRITICAL 9.8EPSS 73.6%

Does this matter?

EPSS puts the probability of exploitation in the next 30 days at 73.6%, higher than 99% of all known CVEs. Patch or mitigate before the next change window.

Description

An issue was discovered in Django 3.2 before 3.2.14 and 4.0 before 4.0.6. The Trunc() and Extract() database functions are subject to SQL injection if untrusted data is used as a kind/lookup_name value. Applications that constrain the lookup name and kind choice to a known safe list are unaffected.

CVSS 3.1
9.8 CRITICALCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS
73.61% probability · 99th percentile
Public exploits
None in Exploit-DB
CISA KEV
Not listed
Weakness
CWE-89
Affected
djangoproject/django
Source
cve@mitre.org
EPSS trend
0%38%75%3 November 2026: 73.61%3 November 20263 November 2026

EPSS 73.6% since 3 November 2026; no change recorded yet. The dashed line is the ten per cent mark our analysts treat as “patch before the next change window”. Points are recorded when the score first appears and whenever it moves by a percentage point or more.

Source: NVD record, EPSS from FIRST.org, KEV from CISA, exploits from Exploit-DB. Refreshed daily. Download this record as JSON.