CVE-2017-16680
Two potential audit log injections in SAP HANA extended application services 1.0, advanced model: 1) Certain HTTP/REST endpoints of controller service are missing user input validation which could allow unprivileged attackers to forge audit log lines.
Does this matter?
High impact if exploited, but EPSS currently rates exploitation as unlikely (1.65%). Schedule it in the normal patch cycle and watch for a rise in EPSS or a public exploit.
Description
Two potential audit log injections in SAP HANA extended application services 1.0, advanced model: 1) Certain HTTP/REST endpoints of controller service are missing user input validation which could allow unprivileged attackers to forge audit log lines. Hence the interpretation of audit log files could be hindered or misdirected. 2) User Account and Authentication writes audit logs into syslog and additionally writes the same audit entries into a log file. Entries in the log file miss escaping. Hence the interpretation of audit log files could be hindered or misdirected, while the entries in syslog are correct.
- CVSS 3.0
- 7.5 HIGHCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
- EPSS
- 1.65% probability · 75th percentile
- CISA KEV
- Not listed
- Weakness
- CWE-74
- Affected
- sap/hana extended application services
- Source
- cna@sap.com
References
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/102138Third Party Advisory, VDB Entry
- https://blogs.sap.com/2017/12/12/sap-security-patch-day-december-2017/Issue Tracking, Vendor Advisory
- https://launchpad.support.sap.com/#/notes/2522510Permissions Required, Vendor Advisory
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/102138Third Party Advisory, VDB Entry
- https://blogs.sap.com/2017/12/12/sap-security-patch-day-december-2017/Issue Tracking, Vendor Advisory
- https://launchpad.support.sap.com/#/notes/2522510Permissions Required, Vendor Advisory
Source: NVD record, EPSS from FIRST.org, KEV from CISA. Refreshed daily.