SOC status:Duty analyst on shift

UK Cyber Defence
VulnerabilityModified

CVE-2015-3455

Squid 3.2.x before 3.2.14, 3.3.x before 3.3.14, 3.4.x before 3.4.13, and 3.5.x before 3.5.4, when configured with client-first SSL-bump, do not properly validate the domain or hostname fields of X.509 certificates, which allows man-in-the-middle…

LOW 2.6EPSS 11.4%

Does this matter?

EPSS puts the probability of exploitation in the next 30 days at 11.4%, higher than 96% of all known CVEs. Patch or mitigate before the next change window.

Description

Squid 3.2.x before 3.2.14, 3.3.x before 3.3.14, 3.4.x before 3.4.13, and 3.5.x before 3.5.4, when configured with client-first SSL-bump, do not properly validate the domain or hostname fields of X.509 certificates, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via a valid certificate.

CVSS 2.0
2.6 LOWAV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
EPSS
11.40% probability · 96th percentile
Public exploits
None in Exploit-DB
CISA KEV
Not listed
Weakness
CWE-20
Affected
oracle/linux · oracle/solaris · squid-cache/squid · fedoraproject/fedora
Source
cve@mitre.org
EPSS trend
0%8%15%4 November 2026: 11.40%4 November 20264 November 2026

EPSS 11.4% since 4 November 2026; no change recorded yet. The dashed line is the ten per cent mark our analysts treat as “patch before the next change window”. Points are recorded when the score first appears and whenever it moves by a percentage point or more.

References

Source: NVD record, EPSS from FIRST.org, KEV from CISA, exploits from Exploit-DB. Refreshed daily. Download this record as JSON.