CVE-2013-0127
IBM Lotus Notes 8.x before 8.5.3 FP4 Interim Fix 1 and 9.0 before Interim Fix 1 does not block APPLET elements in HTML e-mail, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended restrictions on Java code execution and X-Confirm-Reading-To functionality…
Does this matter?
Lower severity and a low EPSS score (3.79%). Track it; it rarely justifies an emergency change on its own.
Description
IBM Lotus Notes 8.x before 8.5.3 FP4 Interim Fix 1 and 9.0 before Interim Fix 1 does not block APPLET elements in HTML e-mail, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended restrictions on Java code execution and X-Confirm-Reading-To functionality via a crafted message, aka SPRs JMOY95BLM6 and JMOY95BN49.
- CVSS 2.0
- 5.8 MEDIUMAV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N
- EPSS
- 3.79% probability · 89th percentile
- CISA KEV
- Not listed
- Weakness
- CWE-264
- Affected
- ibm/lotus notes
- Source
- cret@cert.org
References
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2013/Apr/262
- http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21633819Vendor Advisory
- http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/912420US Government Resource
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/83775
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2013/Apr/262
- http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21633819Vendor Advisory
- http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/912420US Government Resource
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/83775
Source: NVD record, EPSS from FIRST.org, KEV from CISA. Refreshed daily.