CVE-2009-3555
The TLS protocol, and the SSL protocol 3.0 and possibly earlier, as used in Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.0, mod_ssl in the Apache HTTP Server 2.2.14 and earlier, OpenSSL before 0.9.8l, GnuTLS 2.8.5 and earlier, Mozilla Network…
Does this matter?
EPSS puts the probability of exploitation in the next 30 days at 87.3%, higher than 100% of all known CVEs. Patch or mitigate before the next change window.
Description
The TLS protocol, and the SSL protocol 3.0 and possibly earlier, as used in Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.0, mod_ssl in the Apache HTTP Server 2.2.14 and earlier, OpenSSL before 0.9.8l, GnuTLS 2.8.5 and earlier, Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) 3.12.4 and earlier, multiple Cisco products, and other products, does not properly associate renegotiation handshakes with an existing connection, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to insert data into HTTPS sessions, and possibly other types of sessions protected by TLS or SSL, by sending an unauthenticated request that is processed retroactively by a server in a post-renegotiation context, related to a "plaintext injection" attack, aka the "Project Mogul" issue.
- CVSS 3.1
- 9.8 CRITICALCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- EPSS
- 87.26% probability · 100th percentile
- Public exploits
- 2 in Exploit-DB · verified · first 10 November 2009
- CISA KEV
- Not listed
- Weakness
- CWE-295, CWE-300
- Affected
- apache/http server · gnu/gnutls · mozilla/nss · openssl/openssl · canonical/ubuntu linux · debian/debian linux · fedoraproject/fedora · f5/nginx
- Source
- secalert@redhat.com
EPSS 87.3% since 26 October 2026; no change recorded yet. The dashed line is the ten per cent mark our analysts treat as “patch before the next change window”. Points are recorded when the score first appears and whenever it moves by a percentage point or more.
Public exploits (2)
Entries in Exploit-DB that cite this CVE. Links go to the Exploit-DB page and to the file in the public repository; nothing is hosted here. A verified tick means the Exploit-DB team confirmed the exploit works against the stated version.
References
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2013-11/0120.htmlBroken Link
- http://blog.g-sec.lu/2009/11/tls-sslv3-renegotiation-vulnerability.htmlThird Party Advisory
- http://blogs.iss.net/archive/sslmitmiscsrf.htmlBroken Link
- http://blogs.sun.com/security/entry/vulnerability_in_tls_protocol_duringThird Party Advisory
- http://clicky.me/tlsvulnExploit, Third Party Advisory
- http://extendedsubset.com/?p=8Broken Link
- http://extendedsubset.com/Renegotiating_TLS.pdfBroken Link
- http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?objectID=c01945686Broken Link
- http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?objectID=c02436041Broken Link
- http://itrc.hp.com/service/cki/docDisplay.do?docId=emr_na-c02273751Broken Link
- http://kbase.redhat.com/faq/docs/DOC-20491Third Party Advisory
- http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2010//May/msg00001.htmlMailing List, Third Party Advisory
- http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2010//May/msg00002.htmlMailing List, Third Party Advisory
- http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2010/Jan/msg00000.htmlMailing List, Third Party Advisory
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-April/039561.htmlThird Party Advisory
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-April/039957.htmlThird Party Advisory
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-May/040652.htmlThird Party Advisory
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-October/049455.htmlThird Party Advisory
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-October/049528.htmlThird Party Advisory
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-October/049702.htmlThird Party Advisory
- http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnutls-devel/2009-11/msg00029.htmlThird Party Advisory
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-11/msg00009.htmlThird Party Advisory
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-04/msg00001.htmlThird Party Advisory
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-05/msg00001.htmlThird Party Advisory
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-05/msg00002.htmlThird Party Advisory
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-06/msg00001.htmlThird Party Advisory
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-10/msg00006.htmlThird Party Advisory
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-12/msg00005.htmlThird Party Advisory
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-12/msg00006.htmlThird Party Advisory
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2011-07/msg00013.htmlThird Party Advisory
Source: NVD record, EPSS from FIRST.org, KEV from CISA, exploits from Exploit-DB. Refreshed daily. Download this record as JSON.