CVE-2009-0582
The ntlm_challenge function in the NTLM SASL authentication mechanism in camel/camel-sasl-ntlm.c in Camel in Evolution Data Server (aka evolution-data-server) 2.24.5 and earlier, and 2.25.92 and earlier 2.25.x versions, does not validate whether a…
Does this matter?
Lower severity and a low EPSS score (2.27%). Track it; it rarely justifies an emergency change on its own.
Description
The ntlm_challenge function in the NTLM SASL authentication mechanism in camel/camel-sasl-ntlm.c in Camel in Evolution Data Server (aka evolution-data-server) 2.24.5 and earlier, and 2.25.92 and earlier 2.25.x versions, does not validate whether a certain length value is consistent with the amount of data in a challenge packet, which allows remote mail servers to read information from the process memory of a client, or cause a denial of service (client crash), via an NTLM authentication type 2 packet with a length value that exceeds the amount of packet data.
- CVSS 2.0
- 5.8 MEDIUMAV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:P
- EPSS
- 2.27% probability · 82th percentile
- CISA KEV
- Not listed
- Weakness
- CWE-20
- Affected
- gnome/evolution-data-server
- Source
- secalert@redhat.com
References
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-05/msg00000.html
- http://mail.gnome.org/archives/release-team/2009-March/msg00096.html
- http://osvdb.org/52673
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34286Vendor Advisory
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34338
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34339
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34348
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34363
- http://secunia.com/advisories/35065
- http://secunia.com/advisories/35357
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1021845
- http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1813
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2009:078
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2009-0354.html
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2009-0355.html
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2009-0358.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/34109
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/0716
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487685
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/49233
- https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A10081
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-March/msg00666.html
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-March/msg00672.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-05/msg00000.html
- http://mail.gnome.org/archives/release-team/2009-March/msg00096.html
- http://osvdb.org/52673
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34286Vendor Advisory
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34338
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34339
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34348
Source: NVD record, EPSS from FIRST.org, KEV from CISA. Refreshed daily.