CVE-2005-3058
Interpretation conflict in Fortinet FortiGate 2.8, running FortiOS 2.8MR10 and v3beta, allows remote attackers to bypass the URL blocker via an (1) HTTP request terminated with a line feed (LF) and not carriage return line feed (CRLF) or (2) HTTP…
Does this matter?
High impact if exploited, but EPSS currently rates exploitation as unlikely (3.09%). Schedule it in the normal patch cycle and watch for a rise in EPSS or a public exploit.
Description
Interpretation conflict in Fortinet FortiGate 2.8, running FortiOS 2.8MR10 and v3beta, allows remote attackers to bypass the URL blocker via an (1) HTTP request terminated with a line feed (LF) and not carriage return line feed (CRLF) or (2) HTTP request with no Host field, which is still processed by most web servers without violating RFC2616.
- CVSS 2.0
- 7.5 HIGHAV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
- EPSS
- 3.09% probability · 87th percentile
- CISA KEV
- Not listed
- Weakness
- CWE-264
- Affected
- fortinet/fortios · fortinet/fortigate
- Source
- cve@mitre.org
References
- http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2006-February/042140.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/18844Vendor Advisory
- http://www.fortiguard.com/advisory/FGA-2006-10.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/424858/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16599
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/0539Vendor Advisory
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/24626
- http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2006-February/042140.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/18844Vendor Advisory
- http://www.fortiguard.com/advisory/FGA-2006-10.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/424858/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16599
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/0539Vendor Advisory
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/24626
Source: NVD record, EPSS from FIRST.org, KEV from CISA. Refreshed daily.