CVE-2005-1009
Multiple buffer overflows in BakBone NetVault 6.x and 7.x allow (1) remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a modified computer name and length that leads to a heap-based buffer overflow, or (2) local users to execute arbitrary code via a long…
Does this matter?
EPSS puts the probability of exploitation in the next 30 days at 57.0%, higher than 99% of all known CVEs. Patch or mitigate before the next change window.
Description
Multiple buffer overflows in BakBone NetVault 6.x and 7.x allow (1) remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a modified computer name and length that leads to a heap-based buffer overflow, or (2) local users to execute arbitrary code via a long Name entry in the configure.cfg file.
- CVSS 2.0
- 10.0 HIGHAV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
- EPSS
- 57.02% probability · 99th percentile
- Public exploits
- 4 in Exploit-DB · verified · first 1 April 2005
- CISA KEV
- Not listed
- Affected
- bakbone/netvault
- Source
- cve@mitre.org
EPSS 57.0% since 26 October 2026; no change recorded yet. The dashed line is the ten per cent mark our analysts treat as “patch before the next change window”. Points are recorded when the score first appears and whenever it moves by a percentage point or more.
Public exploits (4)
Entries in Exploit-DB that cite this CVE. Links go to the Exploit-DB page and to the file in the public repository; nothing is hosted here. A verified tick means the Exploit-DB team confirmed the exploit works against the stated version.
| EDB-ID | Title | Type | Published | Verified |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDB-16448source ↗ | BakBone NetVault - Remote Heap Overflow (Metasploit)windows · Metasploit | remote | 20 September 2010 | yes |
| EDB-990source ↗ | BakBone NetVault 6.x/7.x - Remote Heap Buffer Overflow (1)windows · nolimit | remote | 17 May 2005 | yes |
| EDB-906source ↗ | BakBone NetVault 6.x/7.x - Remote Heap Buffer Overflow (2)windows · class101 | remote | 1 April 2005 | yes |
| EDB-905source ↗ | BakBone NetVault 6.x/7.x - Local Stack Buffer Overflowwindows · class101 | local | 1 April 2005 | yes |
References
- http://secunia.com/advisories/14814Vendor Advisory
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1013625Exploit
- http://www.class101.org/netv-locsbof.pdfVendor Advisory
- http://www.class101.org/netv-remhbof.pdfVendor Advisory
- http://www.hat-squad.com/en/000164.htmlExploit, Vendor Advisory
- http://www.hat-squad.com/en/000165.htmlExploit, Vendor Advisory
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/394801Vendor Advisory
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/12967Exploit
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/19932
- http://secunia.com/advisories/14814Vendor Advisory
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1013625Exploit
- http://www.class101.org/netv-locsbof.pdfVendor Advisory
- http://www.class101.org/netv-remhbof.pdfVendor Advisory
- http://www.hat-squad.com/en/000164.htmlExploit, Vendor Advisory
- http://www.hat-squad.com/en/000165.htmlExploit, Vendor Advisory
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/394801Vendor Advisory
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/12967Exploit
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/19932
Source: NVD record, EPSS from FIRST.org, KEV from CISA, exploits from Exploit-DB. Refreshed daily. Download this record as JSON.