CVE-2004-0172
Heap-based buffer overflow in the search_for_command function of ltrace 0.3.10, if it is installed setuid, could allow local users to execute arbitrary code via a long filename.
Does this matter?
High impact if exploited, but EPSS currently rates exploitation as unlikely (0.48%). Schedule it in the normal patch cycle and watch for a rise in EPSS or a public exploit.
Description
Heap-based buffer overflow in the search_for_command function of ltrace 0.3.10, if it is installed setuid, could allow local users to execute arbitrary code via a long filename. NOTE: It is unclear whether there are any packages that install ltrace as a setuid program, so this candidate might be REJECTed.
- CVSS 2.0
- 7.2 HIGHAV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
- EPSS
- 0.48% probability · 40th percentile
- CISA KEV
- Not listed
- Affected
- juan cespedes/ltrace
- Source
- cve@mitre.org
References
- http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2003-October/011600.html
- http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2003-October/011610.html
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1007896
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/8790Vendor Advisory
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/13389
- http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2003-October/011600.html
- http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2003-October/011610.html
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1007896
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/8790Vendor Advisory
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/13389
Source: NVD record, EPSS from FIRST.org, KEV from CISA. Refreshed daily.