{"id":"CVE-2026-64112","url":"https://www.cyber-defence.io/tools/cve/CVE-2026-64112","generatedAt":"2026-10-28T07:04:26.135Z","title":"In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rbd: eliminate a race in lock_dwork draining on unmap Given how rbd_lock_add_request() and rbd_img_exclusive_lock() are written, lock_dwork may be (re)queued more than it's actually…","description":"In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nrbd: eliminate a race in lock_dwork draining on unmap\n\nGiven how rbd_lock_add_request() and rbd_img_exclusive_lock() are\nwritten, lock_dwork may be (re)queued more than it's actually needed:\nfor example in case a new I/O request comes in while we are in the\nmiddle of rbd_acquire_lock() on behalf of another I/O request.  This is\nexpected and with rbd_release_lock() preemptively canceling lock_dwork\nis benign under normal operation.\n\nA more problematic example is maybe_kick_acquire():\n\n    if (have_requests || delayed_work_pending(&rbd_dev->lock_dwork)) {\n            dout(\"%s rbd_dev %p kicking lock_dwork\\n\", __func__, rbd_dev);\n            mod_delayed_work(rbd_dev->task_wq, &rbd_dev->lock_dwork, 0);\n    }\n\nIt's not unrealistic for lock_dwork to get canceled right after\ndelayed_work_pending() returns true and for mod_delayed_work() to\nrequeue it right there anyway.  This is a classic TOCTOU race.\n\nWhen it comes to unmapping the image, there is an implicit assumption\nof no self-initiated exclusive lock activity past the point of return\nfrom rbd_dev_image_unlock() which unlocks the lock if it happens to be\nheld.  This unlock is assumed to be final and lock_dwork (as well as\nall other exclusive lock tasks, really) isn't expected to get queued\nagain.  However, lock_dwork is canceled only in cancel_tasks_sync()\n(i.e. later in the unmap sequence) and on top of that the cancellation\ncan get in effect nullified by maybe_kick_acquire().  This may result\nin rbd_acquire_lock() executing after rbd_dev_device_release() and\nrbd_dev_image_release() run and free and/or reset a bunch of things.\nOne of the possible failure modes then is a violated\n\n    rbd_assert(rbd_image_format_valid(rbd_dev->image_format));\n\nin rbd_dev_header_info() which is called via rbd_dev_refresh() from\nrbd_post_acquire_action().\n\nRedo exclusive lock task draining to provide saner semantics and try\nto meet the assumptions around rbd_dev_image_unlock().","published":"2026-07-19T16:17:53.000Z","lastModified":"2026-10-19T21:17:24.000Z","status":"Modified","sourceIdentifier":"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67","cvss":{"version":"3.1","score":7.8,"severity":"HIGH","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H"},"cwe":["CWE-367","CWE-362"],"affected":["linux/linux kernel"],"epss":{"score":0.001,"percentile":0.00821,"date":"2026-10-27","history":[]},"kev":{"listed":false},"exploits":{"count":0,"verified":false,"firstPublished":null,"source":"Exploit-DB (https://gitlab.com/exploit-database/exploitdb)","entries":[]},"verdict":{"level":"high","text":"High impact if exploited, but EPSS currently rates exploitation as unlikely (0.10%). Schedule it in the normal patch cycle and watch for a rise in EPSS or a public exploit."},"changes":[],"references":[{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3427d7ae38337066ce88b68302e285d344ab756b","tags":["Patch"],"source":"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"},{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9400efc76b42c751211974a25c91d2c19c65b01b","tags":["Patch"],"source":"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"},{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9dcd4f5c99b491c37be90b0bd9988db48225fb75","tags":["Patch"],"source":"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"},{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9fc75b71fdd38465c76c6f6a884cdd4ae3c72d90","tags":["Patch"],"source":"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"}],"sources":{"nvd":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-64112","epss":"https://www.first.org/epss/","kev":"https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog","exploitdb":"https://www.exploit-db.com/"},"licence":"CC BY 4.0 — link back to the CVE Explorer if you publish the results; upstream data remains subject to its own terms."}