{"id":"CVE-2026-109383","url":"https://www.cyber-defence.io/tools/cve/CVE-2026-109383","generatedAt":"2026-10-28T01:11:59.183Z","title":"undici is an HTTP client library for Node.js.","description":"undici is an HTTP client library for Node.js. In versions 4.0.0 through 6.29.0, 7.0.0 through 7.30.0, and 8.0.0 through 8.12.1, its Agent dispatcher passes its constructor options through a JSON-based deep clone before forwarding them to each per-origin pool, and because JSON cannot represent functions, a caller-supplied tls option containing a checkServerIdentity callback is silently dropped before it reaches the TLS layer. As a result, a TLS peer whose certificate a custom checkServerIdentity was written to reject, but which passes Node's default hostname and chain checks, is silently accepted. Because Agent is the default dispatcher behind request, fetch, and setGlobalDispatcher, this affects the path most applications use, and EnvHttpProxyAgent is affected on its direct and no-proxy routes as well, while only applications that pass a function-valued tls option such as a custom checkServerIdentity for certificate or public-key pinning are at risk. The issue is fixed in undici 6.29.1, 7.30.1, and 8.12.2, which preserve the tls option outside the JSON clone so custom verification callbacks are forwarded unchanged, and users should upgrade to one of those versions or later. As a workaround, pass the TLS options through connect instead of tls, or for proxied destinations use requestTls and proxyTls.","published":"2026-10-15T19:17:21.000Z","lastModified":"2026-10-19T20:45:52.000Z","status":"Analyzed","sourceIdentifier":"ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb","cvss":{"version":"3.1","score":9.1,"severity":"CRITICAL","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N"},"cwe":["CWE-295"],"affected":["nodejs/undici"],"epss":{"score":0.00184,"percentile":0.07926,"date":"2026-10-26","history":[{"date":"2026-10-16","score":0.0018,"percentile":0.07019}]},"kev":{"listed":false},"exploits":{"count":0,"verified":false,"firstPublished":null,"source":"Exploit-DB (https://gitlab.com/exploit-database/exploitdb)","entries":[]},"verdict":{"level":"high","text":"High impact if exploited, but EPSS currently rates exploitation as unlikely (0.18%). Schedule it in the normal patch cycle and watch for a rise in EPSS or a public exploit."},"changes":[{"kind":"scored","label":"Newly scored","at":"2026-10-19T21:00:19.000Z","detail":{"from":"7.4","score":"9.1","severity":"CRITICAL","fromSeverity":"HIGH"},"summary":"Now scored CVSS 9.1 CRITICAL (was 7.4)."},{"kind":"new","label":"New CVE","at":"2026-10-15T19:17:21.000Z","detail":{"score":"7.4","severity":"HIGH","publishedAt":"2026-10-15T19:17:20.853Z"},"summary":"New CVE, critical severity (CVSS 9.1)."}],"references":[{"url":"https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html","tags":["Vendor Advisory"],"source":"ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb"},{"url":"https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-2m5v-pch6-74hx","tags":["Mitigation","Vendor Advisory"],"source":"ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb"}],"sources":{"nvd":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-109383","epss":"https://www.first.org/epss/","kev":"https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog","exploitdb":"https://www.exploit-db.com/"},"licence":"CC BY 4.0 — link back to the CVE Explorer if you publish the results; upstream data remains subject to its own terms."}