{"id":"CVE-2025-38338","url":"https://www.cyber-defence.io/tools/cve/CVE-2025-38338","generatedAt":"2026-10-28T07:25:33.682Z","title":"In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs/nfs/read: fix double-unlock bug in nfs_return_empty_folio() Sometimes, when a file was read while it was being truncated by another NFS client, the kernel could deadlock because…","description":"In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nfs/nfs/read: fix double-unlock bug in nfs_return_empty_folio()\n\nSometimes, when a file was read while it was being truncated by\nanother NFS client, the kernel could deadlock because folio_unlock()\nwas called twice, and the second call would XOR back the `PG_locked`\nflag.\n\nMost of the time (depending on the timing of the truncation), nobody\nnotices the problem because folio_unlock() gets called three times,\nwhich flips `PG_locked` back off:\n\n 1. vfs_read, nfs_read_folio, ... nfs_read_add_folio,\n    nfs_return_empty_folio\n 2. vfs_read, nfs_read_folio, ... netfs_read_collection,\n    netfs_unlock_abandoned_read_pages\n 3. vfs_read, ... nfs_do_read_folio, nfs_read_add_folio,\n    nfs_return_empty_folio\n\nThe problem is that nfs_read_add_folio() is not supposed to unlock the\nfolio if fscache is enabled, and a nfs_netfs_folio_unlock() check is\nmissing in nfs_return_empty_folio().\n\nRarely this leads to a warning in netfs_read_collection():\n\n ------------[ cut here ]------------\n R=0000031c: folio 10 is not locked\n WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 29 at fs/netfs/read_collect.c:133 netfs_read_collection+0x7c0/0xf00\n [...]\n Workqueue: events_unbound netfs_read_collection_worker\n RIP: 0010:netfs_read_collection+0x7c0/0xf00\n [...]\n Call Trace:\n  <TASK>\n  netfs_read_collection_worker+0x67/0x80\n  process_one_work+0x12e/0x2c0\n  worker_thread+0x295/0x3a0\n\nMost of the time, however, processes just get stuck forever in\nfolio_wait_bit_common(), waiting for `PG_locked` to disappear, which\nnever happens because nobody is really holding the folio lock.","published":"2025-07-10T09:15:29.000Z","lastModified":"2026-06-17T09:16:39.000Z","status":"Analyzed","sourceIdentifier":"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67","cvss":{"version":"3.1","score":7.8,"severity":"HIGH","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H"},"cwe":["CWE-415"],"affected":["linux/linux kernel"],"epss":{"score":0.00185,"percentile":0.08034,"date":"2026-10-27","history":[]},"kev":{"listed":false},"exploits":{"count":0,"verified":false,"firstPublished":null,"source":"Exploit-DB (https://gitlab.com/exploit-database/exploitdb)","entries":[]},"verdict":{"level":"high","text":"High impact if exploited, but EPSS currently rates exploitation as unlikely (0.18%). Schedule it in the normal patch cycle and watch for a rise in EPSS or a public exploit."},"changes":[],"references":[{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/14f5549ad163be2c018abc1bb38370fff617a243","tags":["Patch"],"source":"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"},{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1e93b61d3eaa14bfebcc2716ac09d43f3845d420","tags":["Patch"],"source":"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"},{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4c10fa44bc5f700e2ea21de2fbae520ba21f19d9","tags":["Patch"],"source":"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"},{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5bf0b9eeb0174686f22c2e5b8fb9f47ad25da6f5","tags":["Patch"],"source":"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"}],"sources":{"nvd":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38338","epss":"https://www.first.org/epss/","kev":"https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog","exploitdb":"https://www.exploit-db.com/"},"licence":"CC BY 4.0 — link back to the CVE Explorer if you publish the results; upstream data remains subject to its own terms."}