{"id":"CVE-2012-5633","url":"https://www.cyber-defence.io/tools/cve/CVE-2012-5633","generatedAt":"2026-10-28T03:22:28.309Z","title":"The URIMappingInterceptor in Apache CXF before 2.5.8, 2.6.x before 2.6.5, and 2.7.x before 2.7.2, when using the WSS4JInInterceptor, bypasses WS-Security processing, which allows remote attackers to obtain access to SOAP services via an HTTP GET request.","description":"The URIMappingInterceptor in Apache CXF before 2.5.8, 2.6.x before 2.6.5, and 2.7.x before 2.7.2, when using the WSS4JInInterceptor, bypasses WS-Security processing, which allows remote attackers to obtain access to SOAP services via an HTTP GET request.","published":"2013-03-12T23:55:01.000Z","lastModified":"2026-06-16T23:47:08.000Z","status":"Modified","sourceIdentifier":"secalert@redhat.com","cvss":{"version":"2.0","score":5.8,"severity":"MEDIUM","vector":"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N"},"cwe":["CWE-287"],"affected":["apache/cxf"],"epss":{"score":0.08157,"percentile":0.94816,"date":"2026-10-26","history":[]},"kev":{"listed":false},"exploits":{"count":0,"verified":false,"firstPublished":null,"source":"Exploit-DB (https://gitlab.com/exploit-database/exploitdb)","entries":[]},"verdict":{"level":"low","text":"Lower severity and a low EPSS score (8.16%). Track it; it rarely justifies an emergency change on its own."},"changes":[],"references":[{"url":"http://cxf.apache.org/cve-2012-5633.html","tags":["Vendor Advisory"],"source":"secalert@redhat.com"},{"url":"http://osvdb.org/90079","source":"secalert@redhat.com"},{"url":"http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/120213/Apache-CXF-WS-Security-URIMappingInterceptor-Bypass.html","source":"secalert@redhat.com"},{"url":"http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0256.html","source":"secalert@redhat.com"},{"url":"http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0257.html","source":"secalert@redhat.com"},{"url":"http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0258.html","source":"secalert@redhat.com"},{"url":"http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0259.html","source":"secalert@redhat.com"},{"url":"http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0726.html","source":"secalert@redhat.com"},{"url":"http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0743.html","source":"secalert@redhat.com"},{"url":"http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0749.html","source":"secalert@redhat.com"},{"url":"http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2013/Feb/39","source":"secalert@redhat.com"},{"url":"http://secunia.com/advisories/51988","tags":["Vendor Advisory"],"source":"secalert@redhat.com"},{"url":"http://secunia.com/advisories/52183","tags":["Vendor Advisory"],"source":"secalert@redhat.com"},{"url":"http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7933293/why-does-apache-cxf-ws-security-implementation-ignore-get-requests","source":"secalert@redhat.com"},{"url":"http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1409324","source":"secalert@redhat.com"},{"url":"http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1420698","source":"secalert@redhat.com"},{"url":"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/57874","source":"secalert@redhat.com"},{"url":"https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/81980","source":"secalert@redhat.com"},{"url":"https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-4629","source":"secalert@redhat.com"},{"url":"https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBWS-3575","source":"secalert@redhat.com"},{"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r36e44ffc1a9b365327df62cdfaabe85b9a5637de102cea07d79b2dbf%40%3Ccommits.cxf.apache.org%3E","source":"secalert@redhat.com"},{"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rc774278135816e7afc943dc9fc78eb0764f2c84a2b96470a0187315c%40%3Ccommits.cxf.apache.org%3E","source":"secalert@redhat.com"},{"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rd49aabd984ed540c8ff7916d4d79405f3fa311d2fdbcf9ed307839a6%40%3Ccommits.cxf.apache.org%3E","source":"secalert@redhat.com"},{"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rec7160382badd3ef4ad017a22f64a266c7188b9ba71394f0d321e2d4%40%3Ccommits.cxf.apache.org%3E","source":"secalert@redhat.com"},{"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfb87e0bf3995e7d560afeed750fac9329ff5f1ad49da365129b7f89e%40%3Ccommits.cxf.apache.org%3E","source":"secalert@redhat.com"},{"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rff42cfa5e7d75b7c1af0e37589140a8f1999e578a75738740b244bd4%40%3Ccommits.cxf.apache.org%3E","source":"secalert@redhat.com"},{"url":"http://cxf.apache.org/cve-2012-5633.html","tags":["Vendor Advisory"],"source":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108"},{"url":"http://osvdb.org/90079","source":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108"},{"url":"http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/120213/Apache-CXF-WS-Security-URIMappingInterceptor-Bypass.html","source":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108"},{"url":"http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0256.html","source":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108"},{"url":"http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0257.html","source":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108"},{"url":"http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0258.html","source":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108"},{"url":"http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0259.html","source":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108"},{"url":"http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0726.html","source":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108"},{"url":"http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0743.html","source":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108"},{"url":"http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0749.html","source":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108"},{"url":"http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2013/Feb/39","source":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108"},{"url":"http://secunia.com/advisories/51988","tags":["Vendor Advisory"],"source":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108"},{"url":"http://secunia.com/advisories/52183","tags":["Vendor Advisory"],"source":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108"},{"url":"http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7933293/why-does-apache-cxf-ws-security-implementation-ignore-get-requests","source":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108"},{"url":"http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1409324","source":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108"},{"url":"http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1420698","source":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108"},{"url":"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/57874","source":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108"},{"url":"https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/81980","source":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108"},{"url":"https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-4629","source":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108"},{"url":"https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBWS-3575","source":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108"},{"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r36e44ffc1a9b365327df62cdfaabe85b9a5637de102cea07d79b2dbf%40%3Ccommits.cxf.apache.org%3E","source":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108"},{"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rc774278135816e7afc943dc9fc78eb0764f2c84a2b96470a0187315c%40%3Ccommits.cxf.apache.org%3E","source":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108"},{"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rd49aabd984ed540c8ff7916d4d79405f3fa311d2fdbcf9ed307839a6%40%3Ccommits.cxf.apache.org%3E","source":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108"},{"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rec7160382badd3ef4ad017a22f64a266c7188b9ba71394f0d321e2d4%40%3Ccommits.cxf.apache.org%3E","source":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108"},{"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfb87e0bf3995e7d560afeed750fac9329ff5f1ad49da365129b7f89e%40%3Ccommits.cxf.apache.org%3E","source":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108"},{"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rff42cfa5e7d75b7c1af0e37589140a8f1999e578a75738740b244bd4%40%3Ccommits.cxf.apache.org%3E","source":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108"}],"sources":{"nvd":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-5633","epss":"https://www.first.org/epss/","kev":"https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog","exploitdb":"https://www.exploit-db.com/"},"licence":"CC BY 4.0 — link back to the CVE Explorer if you publish the results; upstream data remains subject to its own terms."}